
Testamentary capacity in BC requires you to meet the four-part Banks v. Goodfellow test: understanding what a will does, knowing your assets, recognizing potential beneficiaries, and being free from delusions affecting your decisions. You must have capacity when giving instructions and signing your will, though lucid intervals during medical conditions can suffice. Thorough documentation by legal professionals helps defend against challenges, while recent court cases provide important guidance on this complex criterion.
A Guide to Testamentary Capacity: Mental Competence in BC Will-Making
When creating a valid will in British Columbia, the concept of testamentary capacity serves as the cornerstone of the entire procedure. This legal requirement guarantees you are mentally capable of understanding what you are doing when distributing your assets.
To meet BC’s testamentary capacity standards, you must understand the nature and effect of making a will, comprehend the extent of your property, and recognize the claims of those who might reasonably expect to benefit from your estate.
You will need to be free from mental disorders that could influence your decisions. Unlike capacity for other legal matters, you might lack the ability to manage daily finances yet still possess sufficient mental competence to create a valid will.
Courts often consider evidence from both medical professionals and those who knew you well.
Defining Testamentary Capacity: The Legal Framework in British Columbia
In British Columbia, testamentary competency represents a specific legal standard that must be met for your will to be considered valid. This legal framework, derived from the common law test in Banks v. Goodfellow (1870) and codified in Section 36(1) of the Wills, Estates and Succession Act, requires that you are mentally capable and at least 16 years old when creating your will.
- You must understand what making a will means and how it will distribute your property after death.
- You must comprehend the nature and extent of your assets that will be distributed.
- You must recognize the people who might reasonably expect to benefit from your estate, including family members.
It is important to note that you can lack capacity in other areas of your life but still possess the specific mental competence needed to create a valid will.
The Four-Part Test: Key Elements of Mental Competence for Will-Making
To determine whether you possess testamentary capacity, courts in British Columbia apply a four-part test that forms the cornerstone of will validity evaluation.
You must demonstrate that you understand the nature and effect of making a will, comprehend the extent of your property being disposed of, recognize the people who might reasonably expect to benefit from your estate, and be free from delusions that would influence your decisions about property distribution.
This test, derived from the landmark Banks v. Goodfellow case, focuses on your mental state, specifically when giving instructions for and executing your will.
It is essential to highlight that you do not need perfect mental health—you can have memory issues or even diagnosed conditions yet still maintain sufficient capacity to create a valid will.
Timing Matters: When Capacity Must Be Present
Testamentary capacity must exist at two essential points during the will-making process—when you give instructions for your will and when you sign the final document.
Courts understand that mental capacity can fluctuate, especially for individuals with certain medical conditions or those taking medications that affect cognition. Your capacity will be judged based on your mental state during these specific moments, not your condition before or after.
- Even if you experience lucid intervals between periods of incapacity, a will made during a lucid period can be valid.
- Evidence of your behaviour and mental state before and after will-making may be considered contextual evidence.
- If you provided clear instructions while capable but signed during a period of diminished capacity, courts may still uphold your last will and testament.
Medical Conditions vs. Legal Capacity: Understanding the Distinction
While many people confuse medical diagnoses with legal capacity, they are actually distinct concepts in the domain of estate planning. A medical diagnosis alone does not determine whether you can make a valid will. You may have conditions like dementia, Alzheimer’s, or intellectual disabilities yet still possess sufficient testamentary ability at specific times.
The legal test focuses on your functional abilities when giving will instructions and during execution—specifically, whether you understand what a will does, know your assets, recognize potential beneficiaries, and can form a rational distribution plan.
Courts often give more weight to observations from friends, family, and lawyers than to clinical assessments. Remember that capacity is time-specific and can fluctuate, which is why proper assessment at the pivotal moments matters most.
Red Flags and Warning Signs of Potential Capacity Issues
Recognizing potential capacity issues early can prevent significant legal challenges after death. When drafting a will, it is essential to watch for indications that testamentary capacity may be questionable. These warning signs should prompt further assessment before proceeding with will creation.
- Significant changes from previous wills, especially those that exclude close family members without clear reasoning
- Urgent requests to prepare a will while the person is on medication or suffering from an illness that might affect cognitive function
- Difficulty recalling basic information about owned property or confusion about relationships with potential beneficiaries
If you observe these red flags, consider seeking a capacity assessment from a medical professional or documenting your observations thoroughly to support the will’s validity should it face future challenges.
The Role of Solicitors in Assessing Mental Competence
Lawyers who prepare wills have a vital responsibility to assess their clients’ mental competence, serving as the first line of defence against future will challenges. When meeting with a client, solicitors must evaluate capacity through careful observation and targeted questioning about property, beneficiaries, and distribution intentions.
Assessment Area | Warning Signs | Best Practices |
---|---|---|
Client Understanding | Confusion about assets | Ask open-ended questions |
Memory | Inability to recall family | Document observations |
Communication | Inconsistent instructions | Multiple meetings if needed |
External Influence | Third-party dominance | Private interviews |
Decision-Making | Random or illogical choices | Test reasoning behind decisions |
Courts often give significant weight to a solicitor’s contemporaneous assessment of capacity. Detailed notes documenting your observations can provide essential evidence if the will faces future challenges based on mental competence claims.
Challenging a Will on Capacity Grounds: Burden of Proof
When contesting a will based on will capacity, understanding the burden of proof is essential for all parties involved.
Initially, there is a presumption of capacity if the will appears properly executed and the deceased seems to understand its contents. However, this presumption can be rebutted when suspicious circumstances emerge.
- The party supporting the will must prove the testator understood the nature of making a will, knew their property’s extent, and recognized potential beneficiaries’ claims.
- Courts weigh evidence from both medical professionals and lay witnesses, with testimony from friends and family often carrying significant weight.
- The evidence must specifically address the testator’s mental state at two critical moments: when giving will instructions and when executing the document.
Fluctuating Capacity: Making Valid Wills During Lucid Intervals
People with fluctuating mental capacities can still execute legally valid wills during periods of lucidity.
Even if you suffer from conditions that affect your mental state intermittently, the law recognizes that capacity is not always constant. What matters is your mental state at two critical moments: when giving instructions for your will and when signing it.
Mental capacity fluctuations do not invalidate your will—what counts is your lucidity when instructing and signing.
If you provided clear instructions during a lucid interval but later experienced diminished capacity when executing the will, your document may still be valid if you understood you were signing a will based on your previous instructions.
Courts will examine evidence of your mental state before, during, and after the will-making process to determine if you possessed the required sound mind, memory, and understanding at these key moments.
Documented Evidence: Building a Strong Case for Capacity
To effectively establish testamentary ability, thorough documentation serves as your strongest defence against future challenges to your will.
Having meticulous records of your mental state at the time of will creation can prevent costly litigation and guarantee your final wishes are honoured.
Contemporaneous documentation from medical professionals, legal advisors, and witnesses creates a robust foundation for testamentary ability.
- Request your lawyer to keep detailed notes about your comprehension of the will’s contents, including your awareness of assets and beneficiaries
- Consider obtaining a medical assessment specifically for testamentary ability around the time of will execution
- Videotape the will-signing ceremony to demonstrate your understanding and freedom from undue influence
Recent BC Court Decisions on Testamentary Capacity
British Columbia courts have established meaningful precedents on will-making capacity in recent years, offering practical guidance for both practitioners and individuals planning their estates. These decisions highlight the nuanced nature of capacity assessments and reinforce the Banks v. Goodfellow standard as the enduring benchmark.
Case | Key Finding |
---|---|
R.R. Estate (2023) | Lifelong intellectual limitations can invalidate wills when the testator lacks an understanding of property and financial decisions |
Allart v. Allart (2021) | Early dementia diagnosis does not automatically negate capacity; lucid intervals may support valid will-making |
Devore v. Devore (2020) | Detailed medical evidence outweighs suspicious circumstances when establishing capacity |
Leung v. Chang (2019) | Cultural factors and family dynamics must be considered in capacity assessments |
These rulings demonstrate that courts examine both medical evidence and contextual factors when evaluating testamentary capability.
How Vest Estate Law Can Help
When traversing the complex landscape of testamentary ability, Vest Estate Law offers specialized expertise to guarantee your will meets all legal requirements. Our boutique firm focuses exclusively on wills and estates law across Alberta and BC, providing exceptional legal services tailored to your specific situation.
- We assess testamentary ability concerns proactively, helping you create legally sound estate plans that withstand future challenges.
- Our team can represent you in estate litigation if a will is contested on capacity grounds, leveraging our specialized knowledge of recent BC court decisions.
- We guide executors through the probate process when questions of the testator’s mental competence arise, ensuring proper administration.
Do not leave your estate planning to chance. Work with Vest’s dedicated estate lawyers who understand the nuances of testamentary ability requirements in British Columbia.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can Someone With Dementia Still Create a Valid Will?
Yes, you can have dementia and still create a valid will if, at the time of making it, you understand what a will does and know your property and potential beneficiaries.
How Does Alcohol or Medication Use Affect Testamentary Capacity?
Alcohol or medications can temporarily impair your judgment and understanding, potentially invalidating your will if you are intoxicated when giving instructions or signing. Judges examine whether substances affected your capacity at those critical moments.
Can Testamentary Capacity Be Assessed Posthumously?
Yes, testamentary capability can be assessed posthumously. Courts examine evidence including medical records, witness testimonies, and the deceased’s behavior patterns to determine if they had capacity when making their will.
Do Video Recordings Help Prove Testamentary Capacity?
Yes, video recordings can help prove testamentary capacity by documenting your mental state, comprehension, and involvement during will-making, providing courts with valuable evidence when capacity is later challenged after death.
Can Capacity Differ Between Changing a Will Versus Creating One?
No, the legal standard for will-making capacity does not differ between changing or creating a will. You will need the same level of mental competence for both actions under BC law.
Conclusion
You have now gained critical knowledge about will-making capacity in BC. Remember, you will need to demonstrate an understanding of your will’s purpose, awareness of your assets, recognition of your family members, and rational distribution plans. Even with health challenges, your capacity is assessed at the moment of creation. Protect your legacy by ensuring you meet these standards when creating your will.

Our main hub for British Columbia is located in the heart of Vancouver. That said, we serve the entire province of BC. We have the infrastructure to work with any of our clients virtually — even in the furthest regions of British Columbia.
Call (604) 256-7152 [toll free 1 (877) 415-1484] to get routed to the best representative to serve you or contact us online to schedule an appointment.
We also have a dedicated intake form to help you get the ball rolling. Our intake team will review your specific case and advise you on the next steps to take and what to expect moving forward.
Our offices are generally open 8:30 a.m.—4:30 p.m., Mon—Fri.


Nathaniel Mcghie
WILLS and ESTATES LAWYER
Nathaniel Mcghie is a lawyer in our Vancouver office. Nathaniel is experienced in representing clients and providing legal advice on estate law matters. He is sought after by both individuals and corporations for legal representation.
